MMTC - MMTC
Financial Performance
Revenue Growth by Segment
Total operating income declined by 49.6% from INR 5.34 Cr in FY24 to INR 2.69 Cr in FY25. Segment-specific growth is not applicable as the company has ceased active business operations across its six major divisions (minerals, metals, precious metals, agro products, fertilizers, and coal).
Geographic Revenue Split
Not disclosed in available documents, though historically focused on facilitating India's foreign trade. Current revenue is minimal (INR 2.69 Cr) and likely derived from residual domestic activities or asset disposals.
Profitability Margins
Operating margins are deeply negative due to the lack of scale; PBILDT stood at INR -138.66 Cr in FY25. However, the company reported a Net Profit (PAT) of INR 69.53 Cr in FY25, a 1.9% increase from INR 68.21 Cr in FY24, primarily driven by 'Other Income' of INR 567 Cr and exceptional items related to asset sales.
EBITDA Margin
EBITDA margin is not meaningful as PBILDT is a loss of INR 138.66 Cr against a revenue of only INR 2.69 Cr. Core profitability has vanished as the company awaits a final announcement on the closure of operations.
Capital Expenditure
Historical Capex is not detailed; however, the company is currently in a divestment and liquidation phase rather than an expansion phase, following the strategic sale of its interest in Neelachal Ispat Nigam Limited (NINL) for a portion of the INR 12,100 Cr aggregate consideration.
Credit Rating & Borrowing
CARE Ratings has withdrawn all ratings (previously CARE D; Issuer Not Cooperating) as of October 27, 2025, because the company has repaid its bank facilities in full. Overall gearing is 0.00 as of March 31, 2025.
Operational Drivers
Raw Materials
As a trading entity, MMTC does not consume raw materials for manufacturing. Historically, its 'traded goods' included minerals, metals, precious metals, agro products, fertilizers, and coal. Currently, these represent 0% of active procurement as operations have ceased.
Import Sources
Historically sourced globally to facilitate Indian imports; however, there is currently no active sourcing or import activity reported.
Key Suppliers
Not applicable as there are no current business operations. Historical suppliers included global commodity miners and producers.
Capacity Expansion
Current capacity is 0 MTPA/units for manufacturing. There are no planned expansions; the company is awaiting formal closure of operations.
Raw Material Costs
Cost of traded goods has dropped to near zero, reflecting the cessation of trading activities. Expenses of INR 5 Cr were reported in the most recent quarter against sales of INR 1 Cr.
Manufacturing Efficiency
Not applicable as MMTC is a trading and services company with no active manufacturing plants.
Logistics & Distribution
Historically significant for a global trader, but currently 0% of revenue as there is no active movement of goods.
Strategic Growth
Expected Growth Rate
0%
Growth Strategy
There is no growth strategy. The company management has apprised that there are no business operations currently and the final announcement on its closure of operations is awaited. The focus is on debt repayment and asset liquidation, such as the completed sale of NINL to Tata Steel Long Products.
Products & Services
Historically provided canalization services for minerals and metals, and traded in precious metals (gold/silver), agro products, and fertilizers. Currently, no products are being actively sold.
Brand Portfolio
MMTC (Metals and Minerals Trading Corporation of India).
New Products/Services
None. The company is not launching new products and is instead exiting all market segments.
Market Expansion
None. The company is withdrawing from all domestic and international markets.
Market Share & Ranking
Formerly India's largest international trading house; currently holds 0% active market share in its core trading segments.
Strategic Alliances
The most significant historical alliance was the Joint Venture in Neelachal Ispat Nigam Limited (NINL), which has been successfully divested to Tata Steel Long Products (TSLP).
External Factors
Industry Trends
The trading and distribution industry for PSUs is disrupting as the government moves toward privatization and direct procurement, leading to the closure of legacy canalizing agencies like MMTC.
Competitive Landscape
The company no longer competes with private traders like Adani Enterprises or Vedant as it has exited the market.
Competitive Moat
The historical moat was a government-mandated monopoly on certain imports/exports (canalization). This moat has been entirely dismantled by policy changes, making the business model unsustainable.
Macro Economic Sensitivity
Highly sensitive to government policy regarding Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and foreign trade canalization. The shift away from canalization has led to the company's obsolescence.
Consumer Behavior
Not applicable as the company is a B2B/G2G trader.
Geopolitical Risks
Historically impacted by global commodity prices and trade barriers; currently, the main risk is the domestic regulatory decision to close the entity.
Regulatory & Governance
Industry Regulations
Under the administrative control of the Ministry of Commerce & Industry. Operations are governed by the Department of Disinvestment & Public Asset Management (DIPAM) closure guidelines.
Environmental Compliance
Not applicable as the company has no manufacturing operations.
Taxation Policy Impact
The company reported a tax expense despite operating losses, likely due to taxes on 'Other Income' and asset sales. Tax % was 2% in the most recent quarter.
Legal Contingencies
Ongoing discussions and potential disputes regarding the waiver of penal interest and other charges on previously outstanding bank debt. Specific case values for other legacy labor or consumer disputes are not disclosed.
Risk Analysis
Key Uncertainties
The primary uncertainty is the timing and final terms of the formal closure of operations, which could impact the residual value for the 10.07% non-promoter shareholders.
Geographic Concentration Risk
Not applicable as operations have ceased.
Third Party Dependencies
High dependency on the Government of India (89.93% owner) for the final decision on the company's legal existence.
Technology Obsolescence Risk
The company's business model is obsolete in a liberalized trade environment where canalizing agencies are no longer required.
Credit & Counterparty Risk
Extremely poor receivables quality, evidenced by debtor days exceeding 37,000, suggesting significant historical credit losses.